Last edited by Nelrajas
Monday, May 11, 2020 | History

2 edition of Final environmental impact statement for hydropower relicensing found in the catalog.

Final environmental impact statement for hydropower relicensing

Final environmental impact statement for hydropower relicensing

Spokane River and Post Falls Hydroelectric Projects, States of Washington and Idaho

  • 349 Want to read
  • 1 Currently reading

Published by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Energy Projects, Division of Hydropower Licensing in Washington, D.C .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Hydroelectric power plants -- Environmental aspects -- Spokane River (Idaho and Wash.),
  • Hydroelectric power plants -- Environmental aspects -- Idaho -- Post Falls,
  • Environmental impact statements -- Spokane River (Idaho and Wash.),
  • Environmental impact statements -- Idaho,
  • Environmental impact statements -- Washington (State) -- Spokane River,
  • Spokane River Watershed (Idaho and Wash.) -- Environmental conditions,
  • Coeur d"Alene Lake Watershed (Idaho) -- Environmental conditions

  • Edition Notes

    Other titlesSpokane River and Post Falls hydroelectric projects
    StatementFederal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Energy Projects, Division of Hydropower Licensing.
    ContributionsUnited States. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Office of Energy Projects., United States. Division of Hydropower Licensing., Avista Corp.
    Classifications
    LC ClassificationsTD195.E4 F554 2007
    The Physical Object
    Pagination1 v. (various pagings) :
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL23155696M
    LC Control Number2007406152

    The Foothills Water Network (FWN or the Network) and its member organizations respectfully offer the following comments and recommendations on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the relicensing of Project , the Yuba River Development Project (hereinafter the “project” or “YRDP”) operated by the Yuba County Water Agency. Application for New License Middle Fork American River Project (FERC Project No. ) February CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ANALYSIS The regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act define a (NEPA) cumulative effect as “the impact on .

    FERC: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for relicensing of the Klamath Hydroelectric Project No. , posted to KBC 9/26/06 *** FERC Final Environmental Impact St atement for relicensing Klamath Dams 11/16/ The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mobile District held its Black History Observance Luncheon Feb. 20 at the USACE Readiness Support Center in downtown Mobile. This year’s theme was “Honoring the Past, Securing the Future,” providing another opportunity to celebrate diversity in the District.

      Final Environmental Statement Related to Operation of Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit No. 2. Georgia Power Company. Docket No. , NUREG, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Washington, D.C. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants. NUREG Finding of no significant impact and final supplemental environmental assessment to the Folsom Dam safety and flood damage reduction final environmental impact statement/environmental impact report / (Sacramento, Calif.: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, ), by Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.


Share this book
You might also like
Content analysis of computer search request forms in a teaching hospital medical library from 1979 to 1986

Content analysis of computer search request forms in a teaching hospital medical library from 1979 to 1986

Geology, Barrier Mountain (east half), Alberta

Geology, Barrier Mountain (east half), Alberta

Treasures.

Treasures.

Fools and funny fellows

Fools and funny fellows

What is Communist anarchism?

What is Communist anarchism?

Report and recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry into the Status of Women in Queensland.

Report and recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry into the Status of Women in Queensland.

Connexions service planning guidance.

Connexions service planning guidance.

PC board connectors.

PC board connectors.

ENERGY AND ECONOMICAL GROWTH: OVERVIEW AND GLOBAL CHALLENGES

ENERGY AND ECONOMICAL GROWTH: OVERVIEW AND GLOBAL CHALLENGES

Canadas competition policy revisited

Canadas competition policy revisited

Shanties to skyscrapers

Shanties to skyscrapers

Modern geometry

Modern geometry

Cap Gemini Ernst & Young

Cap Gemini Ernst & Young

Doesnt anyone care ...?.

Doesnt anyone care ...?.

Final environmental impact statement for hydropower relicensing Download PDF EPUB FB2

Final environmental impact statement for hydropower relicensing Box Canyon Hydroelectric Project, FERC project no, Washington and Idaho. Published: () Draft environmental impact statement Swan Falls Hydroelectric Project, Idaho: FERC Project No. / Published: ().

Get this from a library. Final environmental impact statement for relicensing six hydroelectric projects in the Flambeau River Basin: FERC project nos. , Upper, Lower, Pixley, Crowley, Big Falls, and Thornapple hydroelectric. Get this from a library. Final environmental impact statement for relicensing six existing hydroelectric projects in the Peshtigo River Basin: FERC project nos.

Caldron Falls ;Sandstone Rapids ;High Falls ;Potato Rapids ;Johnson Falls ;Peshtigo. [United States. Office of Hydropower Licensing.]. Final environmental impact statement for hydropower relicensing book environmental impact statement for hydropower licensing [microform]: St.

Lawrence-FDR Power Project, FERC project no. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Energy Projects, Division of Hydropower--Environment and Engineering ; N.Y. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Washington, D.C. ( First St., NE, Washington. Final environmental impact statement for hydropower licensing [microform]: Soda Project (FERC Project no.

); Grace-Cove Project (FERC Project no. ); Oneida Project (FERC Project no. ) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Energy Projects, Division of Engineering and Environmental Review Washington, DC ( First.

Start Preamble. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR partthe Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for license for the Bucks Creek Hydropower Project (FERC No.

) and has prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS) for the project. Analysis, Design and construction, Environmental conditions, Environmental impact statements, Fishways, Hydroelectric power plants, Power utilization, Spillways, Vortex-motion Places Columbia River, Rocky Reach Reservoir Region, Rocky Reach Reservoir Region (Wash.), Washington.

preparing the Exhibit E (Environmental Report) of a license application or intend to prepare and submit an environmental document as part of their application. The Commission staff typically prepares an environmental assessment (EA) to support licensing decisions.

An File Size: KB. The role of ecosystem valuation in environmental decision making: Hydropower relicensing and dam removal on the Elwha River Article (PDF Available) in Ecological Economics 56(4) Final environmental impact statement for hydropower license: Catawba-Wateree hydroelectric project--FERC project no.

North Carolina and South Carolina E F «Previous. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE Loup River Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. Nebraska Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing First Street, NE Washington, D.C.

June FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/05/File Size: 4MB. Final environmental impact statement}, author = {}, abstractNote = {This final environmental impact statement (FEIS) has been prepared for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) to consider modifications to the existing Lower Mokelumne River Project (LMRP) (FERC Project No.

) in California. Chinook salmon and steelhead. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may have a significant effect on the human environment.

Excluded from this requirement are rules that are clarifying, corrective, or procedural, or that do not substantially change the effect of legislation or the. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR Partthe Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for license for the Bucks Creek Hydropower Project (FERC No.

) and has prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS. Hydropower policy in the United States includes all the laws, rules, regulations, programs and agencies that govern the national hydroelectric industry.

Federal policy concerning waterpower developed over considerable time before the advent of electricity, and at times, has changed considerably, as water uses, available scientific technologies and considerations developed to the present day.

The Pit River is a major river draining from northeastern California into the state's Central Valley. The Pit, the Klamath and the Columbia are the only three rivers in the U.S. that cross the Cascade Range. The longest tributary of the Sacramento River, it contributes as much as eighty percent of their combined water volume into the Shasta Lake reservoir; the junction of their Shasta Lake Country: United States.

formal adoption of the rules) (see Table 1). 4 The Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Assessment (EIS/EA) and license order for each case were obtained from FERC records.

FERCFinal Environmental Impact Statement for Moosehead Proj et al. in Kennebec River Basin, ME Office of Hydropower Relicensing, Washington, DC () July 28Cited by: Channel Maintenance in Hydropower Relicensing Channel Maintenance Considerations in Hydropower Relicensing J.P.

Potyondy, E.D. Andrews ROS Book: USFS: PCWA-Lpdf: Final Environmental Impact Statement Stanislaus River Project. Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement In CASE E - Proceeding on Motion of the Commission to Implement a Large-Scale Renewable Program and a Clean Energy Standard.

CASE M – Proceeding on Motion of the Commission in Regard to Reforming the Energy Vision. CASE M – Proceeding on Motion of the. @article{osti_, title = {Application procedures for hydropower licenses, exemptions, and preliminary permits}, author = {Not Available}, abstractNote = {This document provides essential information regarding the FERC's regulations and procedures for filing an application with the Commission for hydropower licenses, exemptions and preliminary permits.In November of this year, the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers released a new Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 14 major dams on the Coosa, Tallapoosa and Alabama rivers as part of the.FERC itself estimated in its Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) on relicensing that even if fully FERC relicensed, the required retrofitting would be so expensive that these dams would then operate at more than a $20 million/year net loss (see FERC FEIS, Table on pg.

). The November FERC Final EIS is available online at.